In his blog entry
New Raetic Inscription concerning a Rhaetic inscription in bronze, American Etruscanist Rex Wallace repeats an incorrect transcription a total of four times despite having posted a clear photo in the same entry showing otherwise. His error has gone weeks without correction. I mark his mistakes in red in the caption below:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92f71/92f719f17e078f17edcb9006f3737b8fd727397a" alt=""
The photo shows clearly the proper reading in the last line (read right to left below):
avaσuerasi (
σ =
san, a plain /
s/, while
s =
sigma, pronounced /
ʃ/). No 'r' there anywhere. The mistake can't be a keyboard-related typo either.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75bf8/75bf876f8c3aa706d92eac01a712e3f0bfec18e3" alt=""
How might
a published Etruscanist manage to analyse an inscription without ever looking at the photo immediately available to him? It doesn't seem like just the usual careless faux-pas. But then perhaps he just switched to decaf. (Arrrggh!! The dreaded decaf! Oh how I hate thee!) At any rate, in a following post I'll discuss my own thoughts on its meaning using a more accurate transcription.
0 comments:
Post a Comment