objective | subjective | |
eventive | *-mi *-si *-ti | *-h₂ór *-th₂ór *-ór |
non-eventive | *-m *-s *-t | *-h₂e *-th₂e *-e |
The above model sides with simplicity to show an overall pattern. Surely experientials (ie. later sigmatic aorists) would belong in the "objective eventive" despite being unmarked by continuous *-i. However, despite these minor details, a quadripartite scheme with the above characteristic endings as above seems to hold true in general and may help to understand how things evolved later on.
Evolution into Anatolian-Tocharian group
Essentially, it looks like the following general semantic changes help to alter the above system in these dialects:
‣ eventive → presentive
‣ non-eventive → preterite
‣ subjective eventive → middle
‣ subjective non-eventive → hi-class present & preterite
‣ experiential *CēC-s-t replaces *CoC-e in 3ps hi-class past
mi-class | hi-class | middle | |
present | *-mi *-si *-ti | *-h₂ei *-th₂ei *-ei | *-h₂ór *-th₂ór *-ór |
past | *-m *-s *-t | *-h₂e *-th₂e *-st |
Evolution into Core IE group
A different path is indicated for this group:
‣ objective eventive → durative present
‣ objective non-eventive → both preterite & aorist
‣ subjective non-eventive → perfect-stative
‣ subjective eventive → a seperate middle voice
‣ middle present *-r optionally exchanged with *-i from active voice
‣ middle past deletes final consonant in endings by analogy with pattern in active voice
durative | aorist | perfect-stative | middle | |
present | *-mi *-si *-ti | *-m *-s *-t | *-h₂e *-th₂e *-e | *-h₂ór/*-h₂ói *-th₂ór/*-th₂ói *-ór/*-ói |
past | *-m *-s *-t | *-h₂ó *-th₂ó *-ó |
Thanks
ReplyDelete